OPTIMIZING CIRCULAR ECONOMY PRACTICES IN NIGERIAN CONSTRUCTION: EFFECTIVE STRATEGIES FOR WASTE REDUCTION AND RESOURCE EFFICIENCY

Hyginus Chidiebere Onyekachi Unegbu, Danjuma S. Yawas, Bashar Dan-asabe, Abdulmumin Akoredeley Alabi

Abstract


This study explores the current state of circular economy (CE) practices in the Nigerian construction industry, identifying key challenges and opportunities for their implementation. Utilizing a mixed-methods approach, data were collected from 200 survey participants and 20 key informants through structured surveys and semi-structured interviews. The quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics, including regression and factor analysis, to uncover the relationships between variables and the underlying dimensions of barriers to CE adoption. The findings reveal that while there is a moderate level of awareness and implementation of CE practices, such as waste segregation and the use of recycled materials, these practices are not yet widespread. Major barriers identified include lack of awareness, high implementation costs, and insufficient regulatory support. Specifically, 75% of respondents cited lack of awareness as a significant barrier, and 80% identified high costs as a deterrent. Regression analysis indicated that awareness level, regulatory support, and company size positively influence CE practice adoption, while perceived cost has a negative impact. The study also highlights positive perceptions towards CE practices among industry professionals, with 85% of respondents recognizing their importance for the future of the construction industry. Factor analysis revealed three main dimensions of barriers: financial, awareness and education, and regulatory and policy barriers. Based on these findings, the study recommends targeted educational programs to increase awareness, financial incentives to mitigate cost barriers, and stronger regulatory frameworks to enforce sustainable practices.


Keywords


Circular Economy, Nigerian Construction Industry, Sustainable Practices, Waste Management, Recycled Materials, Barriers to Implementation, Awareness, Regulatory Support, Financial Incentives.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adams, K. T., Osmani, M., Thorpe, T., & Thornback, J. (2017). Circular economy in construction: Current awareness, challenges and enablers. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Waste and Resource Management, 170(1), 15-24.

Adewuyi, T. O., & Odesola, I. A. (2016). Challenges to effective environmental and waste management practices in Nigeria. Journal of Applied Sciences and Environmental Management, 20(4), 777-785.

Ajayi, S. O., Oyedele, L. O., Bilal, M., Akinade, O. O., Alaka, H. A., Owolabi, H. A., & Kadiri, K. O. (2017). Waste effectiveness of the construction industry: Understanding the impediments and requisites for improvements. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 102, 101-112.

Akanbi, L. A., Oyedele, L. O., Akinade, O. O., Ajayi, S. O., Davila Delgado, M., Bilal, M., & Bello, S. A. (2018). Salvaging building materials in a circular economy: A BIM-based whole-life performance estimator. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 129, 175-186.

Akanni, P. O., Oke, A. E., & Akpomiemie, O. A. (2015). Impact of environmental factors on building project performance in Delta State, Nigeria. HBRC Journal, 11(1), 91-97.

Akinade, O. O., Oyedele, L. O., Omoteso, K., Ajayi, S. O., Bilal, M., Owolabi, H. A., & Bello, S. A. (2017). BIM-based deconstruction tool: Towards essential functionalities. International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, 6(1), 260-271.

Babatunde, S. O., Perera, S., Zhou, L., & Udeaja, C. (2020). Barriers to BIM implementation and ways forward to improve its adoption in the Nigerian AEC firms. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 38(1), 74-96.

Bilal, M., Oyedele, L. O., Qadir, J., Munir, K., Ajayi, S. O., Akinade, O. O., & Pasha, M. (2016). Big data in the construction industry: A review of present status, opportunities, and future trends. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 30(3), 500-521.

Bocken, N. M. P., de Pauw, I., Bakker, C., & van der Grinten, B. (2016). Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 33(5), 308-320.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589-597.

Bryman, A. (2016). Social Research Methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Cheshire, D. (2016). Building Revolutions: Applying the Circular Economy to the Built Environment. RIBA Publishing.

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Ding, T., Xiao, J., Tam, V. W. Y., & Jiang, W. (2016). A closed-loop life cycle assessment of recycled aggregate concrete utilization in China. Waste Management, 56, 367-375.

Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2017). Circular Economy in Detail. Retrieved from https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/explore/circular-economy-in-detail

European Commission. (2015). Closing the loop - An EU action plan for the Circular Economy. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/environment/circular-economy/

Field, A. (2018). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Flick, U. (2018). An Introduction to Qualitative Research (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M. P., & Hultink, E. J. (2017). The circular economy – A new sustainability paradigm? Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 757-768.

Ghisellini, P., Ripa, M., & Ulgiati, S. (2016). Exploring environmental and economic costs and benefits of a circular economy approach to the construction and demolition sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 167, 143-156.

Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59-82.

Hossain, M. U., Poon, C. S., & Lo, I. M. C. (2018). Promoting the circular economy and sustainability of the built environment in urban cities: A case study of Hong Kong. Journal of Urban Management, 7(2), 80-91.

Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112-133.

King, N., & Horrocks, C. (2010). Interviews in Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications.

Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., & Hekkert, M. (2017). Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 127, 221-232.

Korhonen, J., Honkasalo, A., & Seppälä, J. (2018). Circular Economy: The Concept and its Limitations. Ecological Economics, 143, 37-46.

Korhonen, J., Nuur, C., Feldmann, A., & Birkie, S. E. (2018). Circular economy as an essentially contested concept. Journal of Cleaner Production, 175, 544-552.

Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2015). InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Lewandowski, M. (2016). Designing the business models for circular economy—Towards the conceptual framework. Sustainability, 8(1), 43.

Murray, A., Skene, K., & Haynes, K. (2017). The circular economy: An interdisciplinary exploration of the concept and application in a global context. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(3), 369-380.

Nulty, D. D. (2008). The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: what can be done?. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(3), 301-314.

Olawumi, T. O., & Chan, D. W. M. (2018). Identifying and prioritizing the benefits of integrating BIM and sustainability practices in construction projects: A Delphi survey of international experts. Sustainable Cities and Society, 40, 16-27.

Olawumi, T. O., & Chan, D. W. M. (2019). An empirical analysis of the determinants of green building adoption through structural equation modeling. Habitat International, 87, 35-45.

Osmani, M. (2018). Construction waste minimization in the UK: Current pressures for change and approaches. Procedia CIRP, 69, 517-522.

Oyedele, L. O., Akinade, O. O., Ajayi, S. O., Davila Delgado, J. M., Bilal, M., & Akanbi, L. (2018). Integrating construction supply chains within a circular economy: An ANP-SWOT analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 200, 507-519

Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533-544.

Pomponi, F., & Moncaster, A. (2017). Circular economy for the built environment: A research framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 710-718.

Resnik, D. B. (2018). The ethics of research with human subjects: Protecting people, advancing science, promoting trust. Springer.

Stahel, W. R. (2016). Circular economy: A new relationship with our goods and materials would save resources and energy and create local jobs. Nature, 531(7595), 435-438.

Stahel, W. R. (2016). The circular economy. Nature, 531(7595), 435-438

Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2015). Mixed Methodology: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. SAGE Publications.

United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Retrieved from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld

World Economic Forum. (2016). Shaping the Future of Construction: A Breakthrough in Mindset and Technology. Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Shaping_the_Future_of_Construction_full_report__.pdf

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Yuan, Z. (2017). The circular economy: An interdisciplinary exploration of the concept and application in a global context. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21(3), 537-548.

Yuan, Z., & Shen, L. (2015). Trends and policies for the circular economy in China’s construction industry. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 19(5), 753-764.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.