FINAL INVESTMENT DECISION (FID) PROCESS IMPROVEMENT IN OIL & GAS MAJOR CAPITAL PROJECT. CASE STUDY OF PT. VUL’S DECISION-MAKING PROCESS

Marco Wibisono

Abstract


Uncertainties from many factors, oil price, production, execution and operational risks, external factors, are issues that impact project profitability. For major capital projects (MCPs), with magnitude of investment well into hundreds of millions or billions of dollars, a robust, structured rational process is required to minimize uncertainties and provide all the required information for a decision maker to make a high-quality, measured decision in continuing with execution of the project.

Semi-structured interview for projects with CAPEX valued around $500 million, and above $10 billion were performed; coupled with comparison between appropriation and actual results, and literature reviews to uncover the complexities, experienced issues that happened in the process. Process and bias analysis were performed to provide solution. 

Reviews were made on Decision Executive (DE)/Decision Review Board (DRB) effectiveness, market price intelligence, high-grading or project sequencing options, external alignment, optimum time period of investment, biases encountered and how to mitigate them. 

To mitigate above identified issues, inclusion of mitigation in the FID process, through DE/DRB alignment, project sequencing, market condition scenarios, technology maturity review, debiasing methods, external stakeholder engagement, and optimize time to FID, including transformation and implementation process is presented as part of the study’s conclusion.


Keywords


Bias; Decision Review; Final Investment Decision; Major Capital Project; Oil & Gas

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bazerman, M. H. & Moore, D. A. (2013). Judgment in Managerial Decision Making, 8th Ed. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New Jersey.

Damodaran, A. (2012). Investment Valuation – Tools and Techniques for Determining the Value of Any Asset, University Ed. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New Jersey.

Farrell, A., Goh, J. O., White, B. J. (2014). The Effect of Performance-Based Incentive Contracts on System 1 and System 2 Processing in Affective Decision Contexts: fMRI and Behavioral Evidence. The Accounting Review, Appendix C.

Kahneman, D., Slovic, P. & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge University Press, New York.

Lindgren, M., Bandhold, H. (2009). Scenario Planning: The Link Between Future and Strategy, 2nd Ed. Palgrave Macmillan, Hampshire.

Nada, Diana (2015). Project Approval Decisions: Exploring Success Factors – A Qualitative Study to Bridge the Disconnect between the Project Corporate Executive Team and the Project Delivery Team. Lambert Academic Publishing, Saarbrücken.

Rosltadås, A., Hetland, P. W., Jergeas, G. F. & Westney, R. E. (2011). Risk Navigation Strategies for Major Capital Projects. Springer-Verlag Limited, London.

Multiple references for Project Management, Investment Analysis, and Decision Analysis, and MCP references from PT. VUL.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jemis.2021.009.02.6

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.