ASSESSING CONTRIBUTORY FACTORS IN POTENTIAL HAZARD NATURAL GAS PIPELINE FAILURE

Ahmad Hasnan, Zefry Darmawan, Ade Iskandar, Aswin Aswin, Diar Azzis Septian

Abstract


Increased energy demand in Indonesia is accompanied by increasing demand for natural gas, where in the next 50 years natural gas is predicted to be the number one energy source in Indonesia, pipeline is the cheapest way to distribute natural gas, in this way, length of pipeline infrastructure will increase year by year. it is still very much needed by both the household, industry, and power plants. The longer the pipeline, the risk of pipeline failure also increases, it is necessary to understand what factors have the most influence on pipeline failure, the method used is to create a factor matrix from a modified Muhlbauer, MICMAC is used to test the strength of the relationship between significant factors causing the potential hazard of pipeline failure. based on their influences and dependencies. The value of the dependency relationship between factors is determined from discussions with several pipeline experts in Indonesia, who work in related fields, the result is that there are three main factors that contribute major potential hazards, without being influenced by other factors, that is determining safety factors in the design process, depth pipeline and the existence of SOP in the pipeline system. One factor, namely depth, can be eliminated because there are government regulations requiring natural gas pipelines to be buried in the ground at a certain depth.

Keywords


MICMAC; Hazard Analysis; Potential Hazard; Pipeline Hazard; Pipeline Failure

Full Text:

PDF

References


A. Anastasia, “PGN Caplok Pertagas, 9.677 Km Pipa Gas akan Tersambung,” 2018. https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/news/20180718093223-4-24093/pgn-caplok-pertagas-9677-km-pipa-gas-akan-tersambung (accessed Aug. 15, 2022).

Y. Maulana, “Pipa Pertamina Cimahi Meledak, Seorang WNA Pekerja Proyek Kereta Cepat Tewas,” 2019. Baca artikel detiknews, “Pipa Pertamina Cimahi Meledak, Seorang WNA Pekerja Proyek Kereta Cepat Tewas” selengkapnya https://news.detik.com/berita-jawa-barat/d-4755772/pipa-pertamina-cimahi-meledak-seorang-wna-pekerja-proyek-kereta-cepat-tewas. Download Apps Detikcom Sekarang https://apps.detik.com/detik/ (accessed Oct. 20, 2022).

Y. S. Laurens, “Pipa Gas Pertamina Bocor, Warga Mengungsi Tiga Kilometer _ - Nomor Satu Kaltim,” 2020, Accessed: Aug. 05, 2022. [Online]. Available: Berita selengkapnya klik https://nomorsatukaltim.com/pipa-gas-pertamina-bocor-warga-mengungsi-tiga-kilometer-%EF%BB%BF/

S. Holdsworth, O. Sandri, and J. Hayes, “Planning, gas pipelines and community safety: What is the role for local planning authorities in managing risk in the neoliberal era?,” Land use policy, vol. 100, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104890.

M. Martaningtyas, D. Herto, and D. Ariesyady, “IDENTIFIKASI BAHAYA DAN ANALISIS RISIKO PADA JARINGAN PIPA TRANSMISI CRUDE OIL DI PERUSAHAAN MIGAS HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION AND RISK ANALYSIS OF CRUDE OIL TRANSMISSION PIPELINE IN OIL AND GAS COMPANY,” 2018.

N. Koreňová, “Security of pipelines in natural gas distribution network,” in Transportation Research Procedia, Elsevier B.V., 2019, pp. 1426–1433. doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2019.07.197.

M. Machado Cardoso-Junior, “Enhancing risk analysis using a conjoint method: FRAM-interpretive structural method-MICMAC Layers of protection uncertainty analysis View project Risk Assessment for road dangerous goods transportation View project,” 2021, doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.14216.34564.

Y. Lu, Y. Lu, J. Wang, X. Zhang, and W. Chen, “Analysis on Causative Factors and Evolution Paths of Blast Furnace Gas Leak Accident,” Energies (Basel), vol. 15, no. 15, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.3390/en15155622.

W. K. Muhlbauer, Pipeline risk management manual: ideas, techniques, and resources. Elsevier, 2004.

C. Fan, D. Binchao, and Y. Yin, “Hierarchical structure and transfer mechanism to assess the scheduling-related risk in construction of prefabricated buildings: an integrated ISM–MICMAC approach,” Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, vol. ahead-of-print, no. ahead-of-print, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1108/ECAM-09-2021-0785.

Y. Xing, W. Meng, J. Zhou, F. Hu, and L. Meng, “DEMATEL, AISM, and MICMAC-Based Research on Causative Factors of Self-Build Housing Fire Accidents in Rural Areas of China,” Fire, vol. 6, no. 5, May 2023, doi: 10.3390/fire6050179.

A. Arantes and L. M. D. F. Ferreira, “Development of delay mitigation measures in construction projects: a combined interpretative structural modeling and MICMAC analysis approach,” Production Planning & Control, pp. 1–16, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1080/09537287.2022.2163934.

M. A. Nikjow, L. Liang, Q. Xijing, and H. Sonar, “Risk analysis of belt and road infrastructure projects using integrated ISM-MICMAC approach,” Journal of Modelling in Management, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 1410–1431, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1108/JM2-02-2021-0038.

D. Ariyani, Mohammad Yanuar Jarwadi Purwanto, Euis Sunarti, and Perdinan, “Contributing Factor Influencing Flood Disaster Using MICMAC (Ciliwung Watershed Case Study),” Jurnal Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Alam dan Lingkungan (Journal of Natural Resources and Environmental Management), vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 268–280, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.29244/jpsl.12.2.268-280.

J. P. Saxena, Sushil, and P. Vrat, “Impact of indirect relationships in classification of variables—a micmac analysis for energy conservation,” Systems Research, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 245–253, 1990, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.3850070404.

S. Chandramowli, M. Transue, and F. A. Felder, “Analysis of barriers to development in landfill communities using interpretive structural modeling,” Habitat Int, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 246–253, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2010.09.005.

M. Ahmad, X. W. Tang, J. N. Qiu, and F. Ahmad, “Interpretive Structural Modeling and MICMAC Analysis for identifying and benchmarking significant factors of seismic soil liquefaction,” Applied Sciences (Switzerland), vol. 9, no. 2, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.3390/app9020233.

K. Energi, D. Sumber, and D. Mineral, “DIREKTORAT JENDERAL MINYAK DAN GAS BUMI,” 2014.

A. Fauzi, Teknik analisis keberlanjutan. Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2019.

A. Shamsuzzoha and S. Piya, “Identification and analysis of the driving factors for product modularity by Interpretive Structural Modelling,” Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 1–24, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.14488/bjopm.2020.041.

M. Moelyanto, M. Marsetio, A. Octavian, R. O. Bura, and I. N. Putra, “Integrated interpretive structural modeling (ISM) and MICMAC diagram for analysis of infrastructure influence in supporting submarine operations,” Engineering and Applied Science Letters, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 8–18, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.30538/psrp-easl2021.0071.

B. S. Nasional, “SNI 7511: 2011 Tata Cara Pemasangan Pipa Transmisi Dan Pipa Distribusi Serta Bangunan Pelintas Pipa,” Badan Standardisasi Nasional, 2011.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jemis.2023.011.01.3

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.