ANALYSIS OF THE LEVEL OF READINESS FOR THE APPLICATION OF ONE VILLAGE ONE PRODUCT IN THE SMALL AND MEDIUM BATIK TULIS INDUSTRY IN SIDOARJO DISTRICT

Ida Kusnawati Tjahjani, Abdul Hakim, Bagyo Yanuwiadi, Dias Satria

Abstract


This study aims to determine the level of readiness of the Batik Tulis Small and Medium Industry in Sidoarjo district in implementing One Village One Product (OVOP) by mapping the assessment criteria based on the Internal Factor Evaluation (IFE) and External Factor Evaluation (EFE) matrices, as a first step in conducting analysis using the Strengths, Weakness, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT) method. OVOP is a way to develop the potential of an area that was pioneered by Dr. Morihiko Hiramatsu has succeeded in alleviating poverty in Japan's Oita Prefecture through the Japan External Trade Organization (JETRO) by motivating the economies of several developing countries albeit under different names. Base on the identification of the performance of 30 small and medium industries (SMI) spread across 5 batik centers, it can be seen that the level of readiness is 81%. The results of the 82 evaluation criteria means that the product quality is good and has been classified as 4 star even though the marketing area is only in the country. So that the value still needs to be increased on several indicators (A). Aspects of Production, Product and Community Development, (B). Marketing Aspects and Product History, (C). Aspects of Product Type, Quality, and Market Opportunities. Of the 25 indicators of OVOP product assessment for the batik category, when mapped in the IFE matrix, 8 are seen as strengths and 4 of weakness, while in the EFE matrix, 7 of opportunity and 6 of threats are seen.



Keywords


OVOP, SWOT, IFE and EFE Matrix

Full Text:

PDF

References


M. Firdaus, “Ketimpangan Pembangunan Antar Wilayah di Indonesia: Fakta dan Strategi Inisiatif,” 2013.

E. Rustiadi and Junaidi, “Transmigrasi dan Pengembangan Wilayah,” pp. 1–34, 2011.

A. S. Meliala, N. Matondang, and R. M. Sari, “Strategi Peningkatan Daya Saing Usaha Kecil (UKM) Berbasis Kaizen,” Optimasi Sist. Ind., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 641–664, 2014.

D. J. IKM, Buku Petunjuk Teknis: Penilaian, Klasifikasi dan Pembinaan Produk OVOP. 2012.

S. Hermuningsih and D. K. Wardani, “Pendekatan Ovop ( One Village One Product ) Sebagai Program Pengembangan Dan Kebijakan,” Jogja Ekon. Bisnis Forum, 2011.

O. Guidelines, “Improvement Rural Living Condition Through One Village One Product (OVOP) Movement,” 2014.

E. S. Parilla, “Economic Promotion through One-Town One Product,” Int. J. Acad. Res. Bus. Soc. Sci., vol. 3, no. 7, 2013.

S. D. Santoso and Fauzi, “The OVOP Approach to Improve SMEs Business Performance: Indonesia’s Experience,” GSTF J. Bus. Rev., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 69–74, 2013.

M. Triharini, D. Larasati, and R. Susanto, “Pendekatan One Village One Product (OVOP) untuk Mengembangkan Potensi Kerajinan Daerah Studi Kasus: Kerajinan Gerabah di Kecamatan Plered, Kabupaten Purwakarta,” ITB J. Vis. Art Des., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 29–42, 2014.

B. Galih, “2 Oktober 2009, UNESCO Akui Batik sebagai Warisan Dunia dari Indonesia,” Kompas.com, pp. 2–7, 2017.

D. Pradito, H. Yusuf, and A. S. Ken, The Dancing Peacock. 2010.

Kementrian Perindustrian Republik Indonesia, “Laporan Kinerja Kementrian Perindustrian Indonesia Tahun 2014,” 2015.

I. K. Tjahjani, M. Hatta, D. Kunhadi, and Purwanto, “Peningkatan Daya Saing IKM Batik Tulis Pendukung Implementasi One Village One Product ( OVOP ),” vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 329–347, 2020.

W. Gati, “Kemenperin: Ekspor Batik Sentuh US$58,46 Juta,” p. 181293, 2018.

R. Online, “Pasca Pengakuan UNESCO , Penjualan Batik Yogya Naik 30 Persen,” p. 93554, 2009.

I. Mawarzi and Jusri, “Improvisasi Batik Indonesia Pasca Pengukuhan UNESCO,” Gema Industri Kecil .Edisi XXXII/Maret 2011 1, pp. 14–19, 2011.

Dinas Perindustrian dan Perdagangan Jawa Timur, “Pelaksanaan Kebijakan Pembangunan Industri Jawa Timur,” 2011.

I. K. Tjahjani, M. Hatta, and A. Wahyudi, “Peningkatan Kemandirian Pengrajin Batik Tulis Kampoeng Jetis dan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Sekitar Melalui Program PKM,” 2017, vol. 2017, pp. 4–6.

I. K. Tjahjani, F. Baharuddin, and E. Yuliawati, “Strategi Mempertahankan Eksistensi Batik Tulis dan Peningkatan Daya Saing Pengrajin di Desa Sekardangan Sidoarjo Psikologi , Universitas 45 Surabaya Teknik Industri , Institut Teknologi Adhi Tama Surabaya Sidoarjo yang secara administratif berbatasan deng,” Jpp Iptek, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 51–60, 2019.

A. Yusak and K. Adi, Keeksotisan Batik Jawa Timur, Memahami Motif dan Keunikannya. Elek Media Komputindo, 2011.

Deputi Menteri Bidang Pengkajian Sumberdaya UKMK Kementerian Koperasi dan UKM Republik Indonesia, “Rapat Koordinasi Nasional,” 2013.

S. Halimatus, “Pemberdayaan Produk Lokal Melalui Pendekatan OVOP (One Village One Product) Dalam Meningkatkan Daya Saing Sektor Usaha Kecil Menengah ( Studi Kasus Pada Usaha Kecil Menengah Batik Tulis Desa Klampar Kec. Proppo Pamekasan),” J. “PERFORMANCE” Bisnis Akunt. Vol. V, No.2, Sept. 2015, vol. V, no. 1, pp. 1–17, 2015.

S. Hermuningsih and D. K. Wardani, “Pendekatan Ovop (One Village One Product) Sebagai Program Pengembangan Dan Kebijakan Ikm Dan Umkm Dengan Keunggulan Daerah,” Jogja Ekon. Bisnis Forum, pp. 1–19, 2011.

Juhari, “Strategi Pengembangan Produk Unggulan Yang Berbasis OVOP ( Studi Kasus Pada UMKM Di Kecamatan Mendo Barat , Kabupaten Bangka Belitung),” JEM J. Ekon. dan Manaj. STIE Pertiba Pangkalpinang, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 84–91, 2019.

P. Kotler and G. Armstrong, “Prinsip-Prinsip PEMASARAN Principle of Marketing,” pp. 1–63, 2012.

F. R. David, Strategic Management, Thirteenth. New Jersey, 2011.

A. Amalia, W. Hidayat, and A. Budiatmo, “Analisis Strategi Pengembangan Usaha Pada Ukm Batik Semarangan Di Kota Semarang,” J. Ilmu Adm. Bisnis S1 Undip, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 282–294, 2012.

N. Haraguchi, “The One-Village-One-Product ( OVOP ) movement : What it is, how it has been replicated , and recommendations for a UNIDO OVOP - type project,” Vienna : Vienna International Centre, 03, 2008.

K. Natsuda, K. Igusa, A. Wiboonpongse, and J. Thoburn, “One Village One Product - Rural Development Strategy in Asia: The Case of OTOP in Thailand,” Can. J. Dev. Stud., vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 369–385, 2012.

Y. Claymone, “Sustainable Local Development on Grassroots Economy through the OVOP / OTOP Approach in Thailand Background of One Tambon One Product ( OTOP ) in Thailand,” in Significance ofthe Regional One-Product Policy, 2012, pp. 15–23.

W. Jaiborisudhi, “OVOP Concept and Community Security in Thailand: Consistency and Limitation,” in Significance ofthe Regional One-Product Policy, 2012, pp. 25–38.

M. Kazuhisa, “Locality and Dynamics in OVOP Promotion,” in Significance of the Regional One-Product Policy, 2012, pp. 1–13.

K. Son, “A Comparative Analysis of the OVOP/OTOP Administration in Japan and Thailand,” in Significance ofthe Regional One-Product Policy, 2012, pp. 75–94.

H. Murayama, “Significance of the Regional One-Product Policy,” 2012, p. 218.

K. Kurokawa, F. Tembo, and D. W. Velde, “Challenge for the OVOP Movement in Sub-Saharan Africa,” 2010.

K. Aizono, “Effectiveness of Third Country Training through Utilizing Thai OTOP Model for African OVOP Expansion of African OVOP with OVOP / OTOP model Common challenges of African OVOP,” in Significance ofthe Regional One-Product Policy, 2012, no. Unctad, pp. 165–171.

A. A. Wijaya and D. Widiyanto, “Analisis Kesiapan Industri Knalpot Kelurahan Kembaran Kulon sebagai One Village One Product (OVOP) di Kabupaten Purbalingga Provinsi Jawa Tengah,” J. Bumi Indones., vol. 4, no. 4, 2015.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.