IMPROVING THE LOGIN AND NEWS FEATURES WITH FINGERPRINT AND CARD LAYOUT: AN EVALUATION OF CONVERSION RATE AND USABILITY

Reyhan Ardiya Yogastama, Agi Putra Kharisma, Nurudin Santoso

Abstract


The discipline of human factors or also known as ergonomics focuses on interactions between humans and artifacts. One example of such an artifact is a smartphone. Currently, many smartphones are equipped with various sensors, one example is the fingerprint sensor. Fingerprint sensors offer various conveniences, an example of their use is to simplify the login process. This research uses the Gapura UB application as a case study. Currently the Gapura UB application does not yet implement fingerprint login, so it is not yet known whether Gapura UB users will prefer to log in using the conventional method (email and password) or using a fingerprint. Apart from that, this research also investigated the usability of news features of Gapura UB when implementing a card layout (as a treatment) compared to the original version which uses a list layout (as a control). To answer these research problems, this research uses an experimentation with the research subjects from the students of Teknik Informatika, FILKOM UB and the research objects are conversion rate and usability. The conversion rate measurement involved 30 unmoderated participants, whereas the usability measurement involved 10 moderated within group participants. The results obtained on the fingerprint login conversion rate show that most participants prefer to use fingerprint login (73% ± 17%) rather than conventional login methods. Meanwhile, the results of the usability test on the news feature using the card layout showed that there was an increase in retention time (51 ± 15 seconds) compared to the original version which used the list layout (31 ± 14 seconds). The score of measurements using the system usability scale also show an increase in the card layout (90 ± 5) compared to the list layout (65 ± 15).

Keywords


Human factor, Ergonomics, Usability, Fingerprint, Login, Card layout, List layout

Full Text:

PDF

References


G. Salvendy and W. Karwowski, HANDBOOK OF HUMAN FACTORS AND ERGONOMICS. Wiley, 2021. doi: 10.1002/9781119636113.

J. E. Hoover, “Fingerprint.” Accessed: Sep. 14, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.britannica.com/topic/fingerprint

H. Han, Z. Qu, and W. Kang, “A login strategy using fingerprint verification,” SSRG International Journal of Computer Science and Engineering, vol. 2, 2015, [Online]. Available: www.internationaljournalssrg.org

B. Tondreau, 100 Design Principles for Using Grids. China: Rockport Publishers, 2009.

P. Laubheimer, “Cards: UI-Component Definition.” Accessed: Nov. 22, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.nngroup.com/articles/cards-component/

N. Babich, “XD Essentials: Card-Based User Interfaces.” Accessed: Nov. 22, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://blog.adobe.com/en/publish/2016/05/05/card-based-user-interfaces

S. W. H. Young, “Improving Library User Experience with A/B Testing: Principles and Process,” Weave: Journal of Library User Experience, vol. 1, no. 1, Aug. 2014, doi: 10.3998/weave.12535642.0001.101.

J. Brooke, “SUS: A ‘Quick and Dirty’ Usability Scale,” in Usability Evaluation In Industry, CRC Press, 1996, pp. 207–212. doi: 10.1201/9781498710411-35.

R. B. Davis and K. J. Mukamal, “Hypothesis Testing,” Circulation, vol. 114, no. 10, pp. 1078–1082, Sep. 2006, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.586461.

A. E. Ernowo, E. Julianto, and Y. D. Handarkho, “Pengujian Website CGV Cinemas Berdasarkan Aspek IMK dengan Metode A/B Testing,” Jurnal Informatika Atma Jogja, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 150–157, 2021.

A. N. Aniesiyah, H. Tolle, and H. Muslimah Az-Zahra, “Perancangan User Experience Aplikasi Pelaporan Keluhan Masyarakat Menggunakan Metode Human-Centered Design,” Jurnal Pengembangan Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer, vol. 2, no. 11, pp. 5503–5511, 2018, [Online]. Available: http://j-ptiik.ub.ac.id

S. Hwan Kim, J. Jin, M. Sevinchan, and A. Davies, “How do automated reasoning features impact the usability of a clinical task management system? Development and usability testing of a prototype,” Int J Med Inform, vol. 174, p. 105067, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105067.

K. Whitenton, “Unmoderated User Tests: How and Why to Do Them.” Accessed: Nov. 22, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.nngroup.com/articles/unmoderated-usability-testing/

S. J. Ghaben, A. F. Mat Ludin, N. Mohamad Ali, K. Beng Gan, and D. K. A. Singh, “A framework for design and usability testing of telerehabilitation system for adults with chronic diseases: A panoramic scoping review,” Digit Health, vol. 9, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1177/20552076231191014.

W. C. McDowell, R. C. Wilson, and C. O. Kile, “An examination of retail website design and conversion rate,” J Bus Res, vol. 69, no. 11, pp. 4837–4842, Nov. 2016, doi: 10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2016.04.040.

C. Andrade, “Understanding the Difference Between Standard Deviation and Standard Error of the Mean, and Knowing When to Use Which,” Indian J Psychol Med, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 409–410, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.1177/0253717620933419.

P. Schober and T. R. Vetter, “Confidence Intervals in Clinical Research,” Anesth Analg, vol. 130, no. 5, pp. 1303–1303, May 2020, doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004731.

Jeff. Sauro, Quantifying the user experience : practical statistics for user research. Morgan Kaufmann, 2016.

P. Mishra, U. Singh, C. Pandey, P. Mishra, and G. Pandey, “Application of student’s t-test, analysis of variance, and covariance,” Ann Card Anaesth, vol. 22, no. 4, p. 407, 2019, doi: 10.4103/aca.ACA_94_19.

T. Tullis and B. Albert, Measuring the User Experience, Second Edition. Elsevier, 2013. doi: 10.1016/C2011-0-00016-9.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.