ANALYSIS OF PRODUCTIVITY BASED ON KPI CASE STUDY AUTOMOTIVE PAINT INDUSTRY

Paduloh Paduloh

Abstract


The research was aimed to measure and analyze productivity in production department at Paint Industry for Automotive, the criteria used  are Quantity of production, number of sales, stock of raw materials, bad stock, electricity usage, loss production, machine breakdown, overtime hours, product stock productivity and Productivity of washing solvent usage. Data was obtained based on questionnaires and company data, the analysis was carried out using Objective Matrix Method and Company Key Performance Indicator to determine the level of company productivity. The results showed that the productivity of the company was low and unstable. Production productivity was the highest productivity but this productivity was not in accordance with the productivity conditions of other companies such as sales, raw material usage, labor, electricity usage, machine breakdown, and bad stock. Another highly contradictory productivity is the amount of overtime production numbers are not following the increase in the quantity of production. When production productivity rose, the productivity of other supporters decreased. These contradictory conditions indicate that the productivity of the quantity of production can still continue to be improved with make stronger controls for other support activities in line production.

Keywords


Automotive Paint; Productivity; Key Performance Indicator; Objective Matrix; Improvement.

Full Text:

PDF

References


REFERENCES

P. Fithri and I. Firdaus, “Analisis Produktivitas Menggunakan Metoda Objective Matrix (OMAX) (Studi Kasus: PT. Moradon Berlian Sakti),” J. Optimasi Sist. Ind., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 548–555, 2014.

D. Balkan, “Enterprise Productivity Measurement in Services by OMAX ( Objective Matrix ) Method and An Application with Turkish Emergency,” Reser Conf. Product. Serv. Next Gen–Beyond Output/Input, pp. 1–13, 2011.

M. A. Pfannstiel, “Bayreuth Productivity Analysis-a method for ascertaining and improving the holistic service productivity of acute care hospitals,” Int. J. Health Plann. Manage., vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 65–86, 2016.

I. Kamil and A. H. Mohammed, “Design of performance evaluation tools for drainage of roads system in developing country (case study: drainage system for city roads in padang indonesia),” Proc. 12th Int. Symp. Anal. Hierarchy Process, 2013.

T. Alda, K. Siregar, and A. Ishak, “Analisis Sistem Pengukuran Kinerja Dengan Metode Integrated Performance Measurement Systems Pada Pt. X,” e-Jurnal Tek. Ind. FT USU, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 37–41, 2013.

S. Widiyawati, “Penilaian Kinerja Perusahaan Mebel Dari Perpspektif Karyawan Dengan Menggunakan Metode Ahp Dan Omax,” J. Eng. Manag. Industial Syst., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 161–165, 2017.

R. Yuniarti, I. Hamdala, and R. D. Bagaskara, “Performance Evaluation of Bran Suppliers With Anp and Omax Methods,” J. Eng. Manag. Ind. Syst., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 27–36, 2018.

H. Azizah, F. Teknik, J. Teknik, and U. M. Surakarta, “Pemetaan industri kreatif sektor kerajinan blangkon terhadap dampak ekonomi masyarakat dengan pengukuran produktivitas,” 2015.

Pribadiyono, “Aplikasi Sistem Pengukuran Produktivitas,” J. Tek. Ind., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 114–121, 2006.

C. Paper, “AMTeQ 2015 Annual Meeting on Testing and Quality,” no. September 2016, 2015.

I. F. Fortuna, Y. Sumantri, and R. Yuniarti, “Perancangan Sistem Pengukuran Kinerja Aktivitas Green Supply Chain Management ( Gscm ) ( Studi Kasus : Kud ‘ Batu ’ ),” Rekayasa dan Manaj. Sist. Ind., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 551–562, 2014.

Y. C. ERENSAL, Designing a Conceptual Performance Measurement Framework of Knowledge Management Initiatives, vol. 39, no. 4. IFAC, 2006.

I. Sukendar, Nurwidiana, and D. N. Hidayati, “Implementation of supply chain management in supplier performance assessment using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Objective Matrix (OMAX) and Traffic Light System,” MATEC Web Conf., vol. 154, pp. 2017–2019, 2018.

S. Widiyawati, S. Soeparman, and R. Soenoko, “Pengukuran Kinerja Pada Perusahaan Furniture Dengan Menggunakan Metode Performance Prism Dan Analytical Hierarchy Process,” J. Eng. Manag. Industial Syst., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 35–38, 2017.

A. Neely and C. Adams, “Performance Prism,” Encycl. Soc. Meas., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 41–48, 2005.

P. S. Poernomo, U. Ciptomulyono, M. M. Teknologi, I. Teknologi, and S. Nopember, “Single Score Performance Measurement,” pp. 1–8, 2014.

G. D. Rahmi, A. Bakar, and A. Desrianty, “Analisis Peningkatan Produktivitas Di Lantai Produksi dengan Menggunakan Metode Objective Matrix (OMAX),” J. Online Inst. Teknol. Nas., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 2338–5081, 2013.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.